tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post6920272895328995419..comments2024-01-24T04:02:06.466-05:00Comments on Why I De-Converted from Evangelical Christianity: A. H. Strong's Attempt to Justify Penal SubstitutionKen Pulliamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12161943466797514854noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-35077245901120938712015-07-24T09:30:33.211-04:002015-07-24T09:30:33.211-04:00Strong is guilty of a vice common to theologians, ...Strong is guilty of a vice common to theologians, going beyond what the Scriptures teach.<br />Moral injustice of the innocent (voluntarily) dying in place of guilty? Well, if you reject that, you will stand before God dressed in your own [un]righteousness, not a good idea. But since you "de-converted from evangelical Christianity", an Orwellian way of confessing apostasy, I should not be surprised.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-62400608529438627512010-05-27T08:07:24.257-04:002010-05-27T08:07:24.257-04:00Hi Ken,
Good comments! I have nothing to add.Hi Ken,<br /><br />Good comments! I have nothing to add.Norman McIlwainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03856427621539946752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-90362018346362310802010-05-11T09:16:13.665-04:002010-05-11T09:16:13.665-04:00The theologian's reasonings are usually far mo...The theologian's reasonings are usually far more strained and contrived than the opposing voices. Occam's Razor rarely favors the evangelical.SteveJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04525881183798559993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-6882920713381918562010-05-10T19:44:03.021-04:002010-05-10T19:44:03.021-04:00But couldn't be argued that couter theologians...But couldn't be argued that couter theologians, do the same thing in their argumentation? I mean wouldn't this thinking defeat both sides of the argument?John Sfiferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00875271904363363020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-82009880661458252562010-05-09T16:11:42.457-04:002010-05-09T16:11:42.457-04:00Steve,
Tney have to justify their existence.Steve,<br /><br />Tney have to justify their existence.Ken Pulliamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12161943466797514854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-882699495059104312.post-28550072804291425722010-05-09T12:16:51.549-04:002010-05-09T12:16:51.549-04:00It's amazing, the lengths people will go to ma...It's amazing, the lengths people will go to make a dogma consistent with logic. Robert Price used the analogy of Rube Goldberg. He'd draw those whacky machines where a shoe kicks a can, which trips a switch, which rolls a ball, which ... etc., etc. All these crazy actions just to accomplish a simple task. Theologians do the same thing with their elaborate argumentation.SteveJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04525881183798559993noreply@blogger.com